The pitfalls of customer focus: When listening to the customer is not enough

Customers don’t always know what they need

A common pitfall is the assumption that customers know exactly what they want. In reality, they base their expectations on what they already know and experience. This means that they often demand improvements within existing structures instead of proposing fundamental innovations. Henry Ford once aptly illustrated this by saying, “If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said: a faster horse.”

A concrete example of this is the rise of smartphones. Before the first iPhone was launched, consumers did not ask for a touchscreen without a physical keyboard. They wanted simpler menu structures and better keyboards on their cell phones. Only after the smartphone created a new standard did people realize this was the solution they were waiting for. This shows that companies must not only listen to what customers ask for, but also observe, experiment and think ahead to uncover latent needs.

An organization that exclusively tracks customer feedback without conducting broader research risks missing out on innovation. Human-centered design and design thinking offer methodologies to identify these blind spots by combining user research with iterative prototyping and experimentation.

Limited understanding of feasibility

Customers view a product or service solely from their user perspective. They usually have no knowledge of the technical, financial or logistical constraints companies face. This leads to expectations and requirements that are difficult to implement or unaffordable.

A classic example is the demand for fast and free delivery within e-commerce. Customers prefer to receive their products within a few hours at no extra cost. While this is understandable from their perspective, it has significant implications for businesses and society. Fast deliveries increase operational costs, increase the workload of logistics staff and lead to additional transport movements with a negative impact on the environment.

By only following customer needs without considering internal constraints, companies can put themselves in an untenable situation. Instead of fully responding to individual customer needs, it is essential to take a balanced approach. Co-creation with internal stakeholders such as logistics departments and suppliers helps companies develop solutions that are both customer-friendly and feasible.

Conflicting interests between clients

Not all customers have the same needs. What is ideal for one group may pose a problem for another. This leads to tensions between different customer segments and complicates making strategic decisions.

A good example of this is urban development. New residents of a city want affordable and modern housing, while existing residents value preserving the original look and feel of their neighborhoods. At the same time, policymakers seek sustainable and energy-efficient building projects. When a city government focuses exclusively on the wishes of one group of stakeholders, resistance arises from the other groups.

Companies and governments that listen only to the loudest or most visible group risk making decisions that are not sustainable in the long run. In such cases, stakeholder management offers a solution. By involving different parties in a participatory process, interests can be aligned and support for change increased.

Customers are not designers or strategists

Customers are experts in their own experiences, but that doesn’t mean they automatically come up with the right solutions. They often provide symptom-oriented feedback without identifying the root cause of a problem. This can lead to superficial or shortsighted adjustments that do not address the root of the problem.

A common example is the complaint about long wait times in customer service. Customers indicate that they would like to be helped faster and suggest more employees more often. However, companies that blindly follow this suggestion do not always solve the real problem. In many cases, the solution lies in better education, clear product information or user-friendly self-service options. By analyzing the problem at a deeper level, companies can make structural improvements instead of just reactively responding to customer requests.

Co-creation as an alternative to unilateral customer focus

Instead of blindly relying on customer feedback, companies can go a step further by embracing co-creation. This involves not only customers but also employees, suppliers, policymakers and other stakeholders in the innovation process. This helps to:

• Discover real needs that clients themselves cannot put into words.
• Develop feasible and sustainable solutions that are both customer-friendly and practical to implement.
• Identify conflicts between different stakeholders and reach balanced decisions.
• Analyze problems at a deeper level and make structural improvements.

Co-creation requires a different way of thinking and working. Instead of exclusively responding to customer requests, it invites companies to iteratively experiment, test and develop solutions together with different stakeholders. This leads not only to better products and services, but also to greater engagement and satisfaction among all parties.

Conclusion: Look beyond customers alone

Customer focus remains an important starting point for organizations, but too single-minded a focus can stifle innovation. Customers do not always know what they need, have limited knowledge about feasibility and may have conflicting interests. Moreover, they are not strategists or designers, so direct implementation of customer feedback does not always lead to the best results.

By applying co-creation and involving various stakeholders in the innovation process, companies and organizations can develop better, more sustainable and viable solutions. This requires a shift from reactive customer focus to a more holistic and participatory approach. This is the only way to create true innovation that not only meets customer expectations, but is also future-proof and impactful.

Source

1. Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Creates New Alternatives for Business and Society. Harper Business.
2. Stickdorn, M., Hormess, M., Lawrence, A., & Schneider, J. (2018). This Is Service Design Doing: Applying Service Design Thinking in the Real World. O’Reilly Media.
3. Norman, D. A. (2013). The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. Basic Books.
4. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Wiley.
5. Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business Review Press.